Structural diagnostic
Rapidly locate the unproven assumptions and critical breakpoints.
Defined commercial interventions
Services built for decision-critical data—not generic “data quality”.
DQIntegrity works where missing populations, distorted values, weak controls, fragmented ownership or insufficient evidence create material regulatory, operational or decision exposure.
Service logic
Exposure. Proof. Actionability.
The work is designed to separate downstream symptoms from structural causes, establish what must be proven, and leave behind a stronger control response—not another layer of commentary.
Core interventions
Four principal service areas.
Diagnostic
Independent Data Quality & Integrity Diagnostic
Define the expected population and decision outcome; trace data through source, movement, transformation and consumption; assess completeness, correctness, ownership, control operation and evidence; prioritise the structural breaks.
Design
Completeness & Correctness Control Design
Specify reconciliations, record counts, control totals, checksums, schema and mapping validation, semantic rules, thresholds, exception handling, ownership and escalation at the right handling points.
Assurance
Continuous Control Monitoring & Remediation Assurance
Move from periodic confidence to automated, risk-based evidence. Test whether controls identify breaks early, quantify decision impact, support remediation and prove sustainable closure.
Leadership
Executive Integrity Reporting & Retained Senior Support
Translate technical integrity breaks into decision-useful exposure, priorities, accountabilities and evidence for governance, audit, regulatory engagement and senior management challenge.
Typical entry points
When DQIntegrity is usually brought in.
Recurring downstream defects
The same issue returns in monitoring, reporting or operations, while root cause remains unclear.
Weak proof
Controls exist, but the organisation cannot demonstrate that expected data arrived or remained meaningful.
Fragmented ownership
Source, platform and consuming teams each own a component, but nobody owns the end-to-end integrity question.
Executive pressure
Leadership needs a sharper explanation of what is breaking, where the exposure sits and what credible uplift requires.
Engagement forms
Focused enough to start. Senior enough to remain useful.
Target-state control design
Define controls, evidence, ownership and thresholds.
Remediation assurance
Challenge delivery, test effectiveness and support evidence closure.
Provider qualification
Translate capability into regulated fit, control and implementation evidence.
Retained advisory
Provide ongoing senior challenge, governance and control improvement.
Independent. Evidence-driven. Commercially focused.
Clarify the integrity problem before expanding the programme.
The first conversation should determine whether the need is diagnosis, control design, provider qualification, remediation assurance or retained senior support.